Blissful Brain
HOME BOOK AUTHOR PUBLICITY MORE INFO CONTACT

Ordering The Blissful Brain

The Blissful Brain is published by Gaia Thinking. For more information on how to order your copy, please click here.

 

Guardian G2: Mind over matter by Andy Darling

"Neuroscientist Shanida Nataraja has proven meditation does more than clear your head, it can put both halves of your brain to work, improving your concentration, memory, and decision-making...". To read more, please click here.

 

Upcoming talk: Yoga Ananda, Reigate, Surrey on Friday the 4th of June

Shanida Nataraja will be speaking at a seminar on The Blissful Brain on Friday, 04th June 2010 at 19:30 at Yoga Ananda Ltd. 46 Albert Road North, Reigate, Surrey, RH2 9EL. For more information, please click here.

Holistic Medicine and CAM

Recently, in the West, we have seen an emergence of Eastern practices, such as mindfulness meditation, Tai Chi, Chi Kung, and yoga, and a resurgence of Western practices, such as centering prayer, lectio divina, and mantra meditation. Whilst an increasing number of Westerners now practice these disciplines as part of their spiritual life, an increasing number of new practitioners turn to these as a result of poor health or disease. It is for the same reason that many people are also turning to other types of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), such as herbal remedies, acupuncture, and reflexology. These CAM therapies offer patients greater control over their health, and their sense of well-being, and promote the patient’s involvement in the management of their disease.

The term “CAM” includes all therapies that are not commonly taught in medical schools or practiced in medical institutions. The term therefore also includes alternative therapies devised by the patient to improve their medical condition, such as the avoidance of certain food substances or harmful environmental triggers. Over the last decade, the use of CAM has increased dramatically in both the US and Europe. In 2003, an estimated 15 million people, approximately a quarter of the UK population, used some form of CAM [1]. In the US, CAM use is similarly high; in a survey done in 2000, more than 50% of respondents were found to use one or more type of CAM [2]. Not only does this provide evidence that conventional medicine alone fails to meet the demands of an ailing Western population, but it also indicates that a large proportion of patients are willing to take some responsibility for the effective management of their medical condition(s).

CAM appears to play an increasingly important role in the management of cancer. In a recent survey of UK cancer patients, a third of patients reported using CAM either in the past or currently [3]. The proportion of cancer patients using CAM is thought to be even higher in the US. A number of nationwide surveys have indicated that the use of CAM in cancer patients in the US is the norm, not the exception. CAM is perceived to be a relatively safe way of boosting well-being whilst the patient is receiving other, more toxic treatments. In the UK, a recent report on the use of CAM in cancer care acknowledged both the value placed on CAM by cancer patients and the increasingly supportive attitude of healthcare professionals towards the use of CAM in these patients [4]. The costs associated with CAM use are high; in the aforementioned US study, costs amounted to more than $34 billion every year [2]. These escalating costs have prompted some researchers to question the costeffectiveness of these CAM therapies. However, in one recent study, a number of different types of CAM were found to be cost-effective, including stress management for patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy, acupuncture for migraine, biofeedback for patients with functional disorders such as IBS, and guided imagery and relaxation therapy for patients with cardiac disease [5].

1. House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology, 2000. Complementary and Alternative Medicine. HL Paper 123, November. 2. MacLennan AH, Wilson DH, Taylor AW. The escalating cost and prevalence of alternative medicine. Prev Med. 2002;35(2):166-73.
3. Scott JA, Kearney N, Hummerston S, Molassiotis A. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in patients with cancer: a UK survey. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2005;9(2):131-7.
4. Kohn M. Complementary Therapies in Cancer Care. Abridged report of a study produced for Macmillan Cancer Relief, June 1999.
5. Herman PM, Craig BM, Caspi O. Is complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) cost-effective? A systematic review. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2005;5:11.

Back to index

Shanida Nataraja © 2010