|
Ordering
The Blissful Brain
The Blissful Brain is published
by Gaia Thinking. For more information on how to order your
copy, please click
here.

Guardian
G2: Mind over matter by Andy Darling
"Neuroscientist Shanida Nataraja has
proven meditation does more than clear your head, it can put
both halves of your brain to work, improving your concentration,
memory, and decision-making...". To read more, please
click
here.
Upcoming
talk: Yoga Ananda, Reigate, Surrey on Friday the 4th of June
Shanida Nataraja will be speaking at a seminar
on The Blissful Brain on Friday, 04th June 2010 at
19:30 at Yoga Ananda Ltd. 46 Albert Road North, Reigate, Surrey,
RH2 9EL. For more information, please click
here.
|
Ghost
Particles and Coherent Superposition
At
a quantum level, therefore, electrons can be seen to exist,
not as concrete particles, but as standing waves representing
a state of coherent superposition, in which all the possible
outcomes exist simultaneously, one on top of each other. A
state of coherent superposition can be likened to a state
of limbo, and therefore matter is often described in terms
of exhibiting ghost-like properties at a quantum level. In
this state of coherent superposition, the quantum particles
are thought to express the full range of potential outcomes,
and it is the choice of experimental set-up that determines
which of these potential outcomes become actuality. Some researchers
have interpreted this to mean that it is the interaction with
the consciousness of the observer that acts to limit the electrons
behaviour to only one of these possible outcomes.
Let us examine this issue further in the following hypothetical
experiment. Consider an electron heading towards a target.
When it hits the target, we know that there is a 50% probability
that it will be deflected to the left and a 50% probability
it will be deflected to the right. Now, before the act of
measurement, we cannot of course say with any certainty what
the electron is doing or where it is located; however, it
has been proposed that the electron exists in a hybrid reality,
appearing as a “ghost” on both the left and the right. The
act of measurement abolishes this hybrid world, and the electron
will be found on either the left or the right. Since the ghost-like
hybrid world collapses into a single, concrete reality, the
process of observation is often referred to as “collapsing
the probability wave”. It is perhaps easier to imagine this
concept, if we turn again to the image of our wave packet
that describes the possible location of an electron in its
orbit around the atom’s nucleus. If we measure the location
of the electron precisely i.e. make the wave packet infinitely
small in size, essentially we have collapsed Schrödinger’s
probability wave into a single, concrete reality. The entire
spectrum of possible outcomes is therefore replaced by a single
actual outcome.
This concept has been most famously illustrated by Schrödinger’s
cat paradox. In a theoretical experiment, a cat is placed
in a sealed chamber, together with a glass vial containing
cyanide. A quantum process triggers the release of the cyanide,
and therefore there is a 50:50 chance that the poison is released
and the cat killed. It is proposed that, until a measurement
is made (i.e. an observer looks into the chamber to see if
the poison has been released), the cat exists in a hybrid
reality, in which it is both alive and dead. The act of observation
forces this ghost-like existence to collapse, and thus the
cat is seen to be either alive or dead. This experiment is
open to misinterpretation. It certainly should not be taken
literally; the concrete cat does not become two ghost-like
apparitions, one alive and the other dead. It merely illustrates
the point that quantum processes are probabilistic in nature,
and that they exhibit the full range of possible outcomes
until the point at which a measurement is made.
There
is much controversy surrounding the issue of the collapsing
of the probability wave. The physicist John Wheeler postulated
that the precise nature of reality was dependent on the participation
of a conscious observer i.e. someone to design and implement
the experiment.
Back
to index
|